A) A lane for jogging. B) A lane for scooters. C) A designated lane on the road for cyclists. D) A lane for parking bicycles.
A) A type of bike race. B) A bike-sharing program. C) A bike rental shop. D) A low-traffic street that prioritizes bicycle traffic.
A) Bike accessories like helmets and locks. B) The network of facilities that support biking such as paths, lanes, and racks. C) Bicycle clothing. D) The sound of bike bells.
A) A track for cycling races. B) A bike lane separated from the road by physical barriers. C) A track for motor racing. D) A circular path for biking practices.
A) They are narrower than regular bike lanes. B) They are cheaper to build than regular bike lanes. C) They do not have any traffic signals. D) They physically separate cyclists from motor vehicle traffic.
A) It provides secure locations to park bicycles at destinations. B) It prevents people from biking. C) It encourages speeding on bicycles. D) It increases pollution.
A) To alert pedestrians. B) To signal for emergency bike repairs. C) To communicate between cyclists. D) To give cyclists their own signals at intersections.
A) To provide parking and secure storage for bicycles. B) To organize bike races. C) To repair bicycles. D) To sell bicycles.
A) An area at the front of an intersection designated for cyclists to wait for the light to change. B) A box filled with bike accessories. C) A competition for bikers. D) A box to store bicycles.
A) Ottawa, Canada B) New York, USA C) Montreal, Canada D) San Francisco, USA
A) Sustrans Design Manual B) MUTCD C) AASHTO Guide to Bikeway Facilities D) The Tekenen voor de fiets design manual
A) Shared use path B) Segregated cycling facility C) Bikeway D) Greenway
A) Bike lane B) Advisory bike lane C) Sharrow D) Cycle track
A) Buffered bike lane B) Sharrow C) Cycle track D) Contraflow bike lane
A) Cycle track B) Buffered bike lane C) Shared use path D) Bicycle boulevard
A) Shared use path B) Greenway C) Segregated cycling facility D) Bikeway
A) Bikeway B) Shared-use footway C) Segregated cycling facility D) Multi-use path
A) New York City B) Amsterdam C) Copenhagen D) Bogota
A) 30% B) 70% C) 20% D) 50%+
A) Crash frequencies increased significantly. B) Road diets have no effect on crash frequencies. C) Crash frequencies were 6% lower after installation. D) They result in a significant increase in crash severity.
A) 8 million euros B) 13.4 million Danish kroner C) 10 million euros D) 20 million Danish kroner
A) Building overpasses only for cars B) Junction treatment C) Removing bike lanes D) Adding more stop signs for cyclists
A) Eurostar B) CrossCountry C) GWR (Great Western Railway) D) Thameslink
A) 28%. B) 50%. C) 10%. D) 75%.
A) Germany B) Denmark C) Netherlands D) France
A) 30% B) 25% C) 44% D) 17%
A) Netherlands B) Japan C) Denmark D) Germany
A) 10% B) Around 40% C) 20% D) 60%
A) 2017 B) 2020 C) 2004 D) 2012
A) A case-control study in 2021 B) A 2019 study C) A 2023 EU report D) A 2021 review
A) Limited to city centers only B) Free use without subscription C) Only available to residents D) Subscription basis
A) 120 km B) 100 km C) 84 km D) 50 km
A) London B) Berlin C) Paris D) Madrid
A) Bike repair shops B) Water fountains C) Service stations with air pumps D) Rest areas with seating
A) Groningen B) Rotterdam C) Delft D) Amsterdam
A) Uppsala B) Gothenburg C) Malmo D) Stockholm
A) Netherlands B) New Zealand C) United States D) Germany
A) Cycle tracks B) Advisory Shoulders C) Shared lane markings D) Bike boulevards
A) Albertslund Path B) Breda-Etten-Leur Route C) C99 D) RijnWaalpad
A) Germany. B) Canada. C) France. D) The Netherlands.
A) 17.5 km B) 10 km C) 30 km D) 25 km
A) 10% B) 36% C) 25% D) 50%
A) Munich S-Bahn B) Rheinbahn in Düsseldorf C) Copenhagen S-tog D) Eurostar |