A) Burden of Evidenced. None of the above B) Burden of proof C) Presumption D) Presumption
A) Conclusive Evidence B) Sur-rebuttal Evidence C) Secondary Evidence D) Rebuttal Evidence E) Rebuttal Evidence
A) I will object because the testimony is hearsay B) I will not object because the testimony allowed by law C) I will object because the testimony is irrelevant D) I will object because the testimony is hearsay E) I will object because the testimony is based on opinion only
A) judicial admission B) judicial confession C) judicial admission D) admission E) extra-judicial confession
A) they are judicial confession B) they are judicial admission C) they are extrajudicial admission D) they are extra judicial confession E) they are extra judicial confession
A) res gestae B) common reputation C) res gestae D) declaration against interest E) dying declaration
A) cumulative evidence B) corroborative evidence C) corroborative evidence D) positive evidence E) direct evidence
A) judicial confession B) extra-judicial admission C) judicial confession D) judicial admission E) extra-judicial confession
A) Relationship of Maria and Peter as mother and legitimate son, respectively. B) Relationship of Maria and Juan as live in partners C) Relationship of Peter and Juanas legitimates on and father, respectively D) Relationship of Peter and Juanas legitimates on and father, respectively E) Relationship of Peter and Juan as son and father, respectively.
A) The accused has the onus probandi because he is the one charged B) The prosecution has the duty to prove because the accused is not interested in the criminal case C) The prosecution has the on us proband because it is the party filing the case D) The prosecution has the on us proband because it is the party filing the case E) The accused has the duty to prove because he will be put to jail if he cannot prove his innocence
A) Presumption Juris Tantum B) Presumption Juris et de Jure C) Presumption Juris et de Jure D) Onus Probandi E) Burden of Proof
A) It is not admissible under the ante litem motam rule B) It is not admissible under the inter aliosactanocerenondebet rule C) It is not admissible under the res gestae rule D) It is not admissible under the inter aliosactanocerenondebet rule E) it is not admissible under the res ipsa loquitor rule
A) When it is handwriting of one whom he has sufficient familiarity. B) When he is criminology graduate C) When he is a Questioned document examiner D) When it is handwriting of one whom he has sufficient familiarity. E) when he has to testify only as to mental and emotional state of the one who authored the writing.
A) the doctor can testify because the case is not civil in nature. B) the doctor can not testify because it is hearsay. C) the doctor can testify because the case is not civil in nature. D) The doctor can testify because the case is not criminal in nature. E) the doctor can not testify because the communication is privileged
A) Misleading question B) Answer C) Leading question D) Leading question E) Maliciousquestion
A) Preponderanceofevidence B) Preponderanceofevidence C) Substantial evidence D) All of the above E) None of the above
A) Whether or not Zanjoe is questioning the results of the paraffin test B) Whether or not Zanjoe is the one firing the gun C) Whether or not Zanjoe is the one committing the crime D) Whether or not Zanjoe is the one firing the gun E) Whether or not Zanjoe is positive for nitrates or nitrites
A) Object Evidence B) Substantial Evidence C) Documentary Evidence D) Direct Evidence E) Direct Evidence
A) It was B who died last B) It was A who survived C) It was B who survived D) It was A who died first E) It was A who survived
A) X died a head of W B) W died ahead of X C) Both died at the same time D) X died a head of W E) X died after W
A) Direct Evidence B) Conclusive Evidence C) Circumstantial Evidence D) Prima facie Evidence E) Prima facie Evidence
A) unacceptable B) incompetent C) incompetent D) irrelevant E) voidable
A) The defense will conduct the direct examination B) The prosecution will conduct re-direct examination C) The defense will conduct the direct examination D) The prosecution will conduct the direct examination E) The defense will conduct the cross-examination
A) object evidence B) testimonial evidence C) oral evidence D) documentary evidence E) documentary evidence
A) I will object on the ground of lawyer client privileged communication B) I will not object because it was true that Mang Tomas had beard the conversation C) I will object on the ground of irrelevancy of evidence D) will object on the ground of incompetency of evidence E) I will object on the ground of irrelevancy of evidence
A) The priest cannot testify without violating the hearsay evidence rule B) The priest cannot testify without violating the hearsay evidence rule C) The priest can testify as the situation falls under the rule on res gestae D) .The priest cannot be compelled to testify because of priest-penitent privileged communication E) The testimony of the priest is admissible because it is a declaration against interest
A) Direct Evidence B) Corroborative Evidence C) Circumstantial Evidence D) Direct Evidence E) Negative Evidence
A) Yes, because he has personal knowledge since, he was present at the time Atty. Iglesias and Floyd Pacquaio had conversation B) No, because the testimony of Mang Tomas is pure hearsay C) Yes, because Mang Tomas he did not intentionally spy on his boss lawyer Enrique Iglesias D) Yes, because he has personal knowledge since, he was present at the time Atty. Iglesias and Floyd Pacquaio had conversation E) No, because the testimony of Mang Tomas violates the lawyer-client privileged communication rule.
A) Implied Admission B) Testimonial Evidence C) Express Admission D) Secondary Evidence E) Express Admission
A) marital privilege communication rule B) res inter alios acta nocere non debet rule C) marital privilege communication rule D) hearsay evidence rule E) marital privilege disqualification rule
A) Formal Investigationd. Re-cross examination B) Cross-examination C) Direct examination D) Direct examination
A) Material Evidence B) Direct Evidence C) Relevant Evidence D) Material Evidence E) Rebuttal Evidence
A) The declaration refers to the cause and surrounding circumstances of the declarant's death B) he declarant survives C) The declaration was made under consciousness of an impending death D) he declarant survives E) The declaration relates to facts which the victim is competent to testify
A) It is corroborative evidence B) it is circumstantial evidence C) It is hearsay D) it is a dying declaration E) it is a dying declaration
A) Estoppel by deed B) Estoppel in pais C) Estoppel in pais D) None of the above E) Estoppel by lashes
A) testimony of a victim's cousin who was a drug addict B) testimony of a blind man in the murder incident involving use of firearm C) testimony of a deaf-mute in the oral defamation case D) testimony of a deaf-mute in the oral defamation case E) testimony of a 5-year-old girl who was raped
A) Prima Facie Evidence B) Object evidence C) Competent Evidence D) Rebuttal Evidence E) Competent Evidence
A) Yes, she can refuse to testify under the parental privilege rule B) No, she cannot refuse to testify because it is not covered by marital disqualification rule C) No, she cannot refuse because the subpoena is issued by the Court D) Yes, she can refuse not to testify because of privilege communication E) Yes, she can refuse to testify under the parental privilege rule
A) written agreements B) objects C) written agreements D) documents E) testimonial
A) Testimonial Evidence B) Positive Evidence C) Rebuttal Evidence D) Cumulative Evidence E) Rebuttal Evidence
A) Ethical conduct of lawyers B) Civil actions for damages C) Administrative penalties D) Manner of enforcing criminal law E) Substantive rights of parties
A) Punish the accused immediately B) Protect only the victim C) Avoid police investigations D) Prolong the trial process E) Secure the conviction of the guilty while ensuring the innocent are not punished
A) Trial commencement B) Decision of the judge C) Filing of a complaint or information D) Arrest of the accused E) Issuance of a subpoena
A) The defense lawyer B) The prosecutor C) The judge D) The offended party or any peace officer E) The accused
A) The police investigator B) The complainant C) The prosecutor D) The judge E) The accused
A) The penalty prescribed by law for the offense B) The nationality of the accused C) The type of evidence presented D) The place of arrest E) The amount of damages claimed
A) At all stages of the criminal process B) Only during arraignment C) Only when he requests for it D) Only during trial E) After conviction
A) In open court B) In private C) Only in the prosecutor’s office D) During preliminary investigation E) In the police station
A) A negotiation between judge and witness B) Decided by the police C) The same as arraignment D) A negotiation between prosecutor and accused for a lesser offense E) Forbidden in criminal law
A) Conduct a searching inquiry B) Immediately convict him C) Issue a warrant D) Refer to mediation E) Dismiss the case
A) The complainant B) The police chief C) The judge D) The mayor E) The prosecutor
A) Civil indemnity B) Fine C) Confession D) Guarantee for appearance in court E) Punishment
A) No postponement is allowed B) The accused cannot delay trial C) Trial must be finished in one day D) The court must dispose of the case without unreasonable delay E) The prosecution must drop weak cases
A) The accused is tried twice for the same offense B) There are two informations filed C) The accused appeals his case D) The prosecution presents two witnesses E) The court changes the charge
A) The jurisdiction of the court B) The civil damages C) The sufficiency of evidence to file information D) The sentence to be imposed E) The guilt of the accused
A) The judge B) The accused C) The complainant’s lawyer D) The defense E) The prosecutor
A) Preponderance of evidence B) Probable cause C) Proof beyond reasonable doubt D) Clear and convincing evidence E) Substantial evidence
A) Issuance of warrant of arrest B) Conviction C) Appeal D) Execution of judgment E) Filing of complaint
A) Character evidence is always allowed B) Confessions can be forced C) All evidence is admissible D) Illegally obtained evidence is inadmissible E) Only hearsay is excluded
A) Always admissible B) From an expert opinion C) Based on the witness’s own knowledge D) Based on what another person told the witness E) Derived from physical evidence
A) The officer who filed the information had no authority to do so B) The information does not conform substantially to the prescribed form C) The facts charged do not constitute an offense D) The accused was previously convicted of another offense E) The court has no jurisdiction over the person of the accused
A) Dismiss the case B) Refer the case to the Supreme Court C) Immediately impose sentence D) Ask the accused to withdraw the plea E) Require the prosecution to prove the guilt and degree of culpability
A) Execute a written testimony B) Produce documents or objects for inspection C) Pay a fine to the court D) Remain in detention E) Appear in court and testify
A) Secondary evidence may always be admitted B) Testimonies are better than written evidence C) Only the original of a document is admissible to prove its contents D) The court decides which evidence is best E) Copies are sufficient proof of authenticity
A) By a preponderance of evidence B) By credible testimony C) By clear and convincing evidence D) Beyond reasonable doubt E) By probable cause
A) Testimony given by witnesses under oath B) Written statements or documents C) Audio recordings D) Expert opinion submitted to the court E) Objects used in the commission of the crime
A) The right to bail B) The right to speedy disposition of cases C) The right to be free from double jeopardy D) The right against self-incrimination and to counsel E) The right to appeal
A) Demurrer to evidence B) Lack of probable cause C) Improper venue D) Rebuttal testimony E) Double jeopardy
A) The facts proving that a crime has been committed B) The person of the accused C) The penalty imposed by law D) The body of the victim only E) The confession of the suspect
A) Speed up trial by replacing direct testimonies with affidavits B) Simplify cross-examination C) Remove the need for witnesses D) Allow secret testimonies E) Avoid written evidence
A) The case is reopened automatically B) The decision is void C) The decision can still be appealed D) The case is transferred to another court E) The judgment can no longer be modified or appealed
A) Filing of the affidavit B) Request of the police officer C) Order of the prosecutor D) Finding of probable cause by the judge E) Motion of the complainant
A) Evidence based on the testimony of a witness B) Evidence obtained from a lawful arrest C) Evidence approved by the court D) Evidence submitted by the defense E) Evidence derived from an illegal search or seizure
A) Bail is not allowed before filing of a complaint B) Bail automatically extinguishes the criminal case C) Bail may be posted only by the police D) Bail is a matter of right after conviction by the RTC E) Bail is a security for the release of an accused
A) Being tried twice for the same offense B) Being convicted twice of different offenses C) Being acquitted and later convicted D) Being tried in two different courts E) Being arrested by two police units
A) Election-related crimes B) Administrative cases of government employees C) Crimes committed by public officials in relation to their office D) All criminal cases E) Civil cases involving government officials
A) Traffic violations B) Drug-related cases C) Estafa cases D) Trespassing cases E) Libel cases
A) Dismiss the case B) Suspend the prosecutor C) Proceed with trial D) Issue a warrant of arrest E) Appoint a public attorney
A) Leading questions by any party B) Questioning by the judge C) Questioning by the defense D) Questioning by the prosecution of its own witness E) Cross-examination of witnesses
A) Allowed during direct examination B) Used only by expert witnesses C) Prohibited during all examinations D) Required in re-direct examination E) Allowed during cross-examination
A) Introduce exhibits B) Summarize all testimonies C) Present new evidence D) Support the testimony of one’s own witness E) Test the truthfulness and credibility of the witness
A) Competent Evidence B) Circumstantial Evidence C) Circumstantial Evidence D) Direct Evidence E) Expert Evidence
A) secondary evidence rule B) testimonial knowledge rule C) documentary evidence rule D) parol evidence rule E) secondary evidence rule
A) dying declaration B) testimonial knowledge rule C) res inter alios acta rule D) res gestae rule E) res inter alios acta rule
A) Testimony of Maria that she is the mother of Peter and Juan is the father B) Baptismal certificate of Peter where the name of Juan appear sin the entry of father C) Baptismal certificate of Peter where the name of Juan appear sin the entry of father D) Birth Certificate of Peter where the entry of Father's Name is marked "unknown" E) Testimony of Maria that she was a mistress of Juan
A) substantial evidence B) material evidence C) material evidence D) corroborative evidence E) relevant evidence
A) Presumption B) Burden of Evidence C) Burden of proof D) Presumption E) Conclusive presumption
A) it is a declaration against interest B) it is considered a dying declaration L C) it is extrajudicial confession D) it is considered part of the res gestae E) .it is considered a dying declaration c. it is extrajudicial confession b. it is considered part of the res gestae
A) demonstrative evidence B) cumulative evidence C) corroborative evidence D) real evidence E) demonstrative evidence
A) It proves the firing of the gun by the person found positive of nitrates or nitrites B) It proves the presence or absence of nitrates or nitrites C) It proves the presence or absence of nitrates or nitrites D) It proves the guilt of the person found positive of nitrates or nitrates E) It proves the conduct of the paraffin test only
A) leading B) hearsay C) leading D) stupid E) misleading
A) None of the above B) Burden of proof C) presumption D) Burden of evidence E) Burden of evidence
A) B's wound must be fatal B) The declaration must be written C) B and A must have argument and has grudges D) B'sdeath is indispensable E) B'sdeath is indispensable
A) Burden of proof B) Presumptions C) None of the above D) Burden of proof E) Burden of evidence
A) The Rules of Summary Procedure B) The Oral Testimonies of Witness' Rule C) The Rules of Summary Procedure D) The Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure E) The Rule of Court Testimony
A) it is an admission and therefore admissible in court B) it is a dying declaration and therefore admissible in court C) it is a confession and therefore admissible in court D) it is part of the res gestae and therefore admissible in court E) it is an admission and therefore admissible in court
A) Expert Evidence B) SecondaryEvidence C) Conclusive Evidence D) Conclusive Evidence E) Real Evidence
A) Conclusive evidence B) Best evidence C) Conclusive evidence D) Secondary evidence E) Primary evidence
A) best evidence B) Corroborative C) Admissible D) excluded by law E) excluded by law
A) Positive Evidence B) Cumulative Evidence C) Rebuttal Evidence D) Rebuttal Evidence E) Testimonial Evidence |