A) A study that shows people are more likely to help when alone. B) A phenomenon where individuals are less likely to offer help in an emergency situation when other people are present. C) A behavior that encourages individuals to intervene in group settings. D) An instinctual response to assist in any emergency situation.
A) 1982. B) 1975. C) 1968. D) 1990.
A) Strong individualistic values. B) Rapid decision-making skills. C) Heightened sense of personal responsibility. D) Diffusion of responsibility.
A) People feel more personal responsibility to respond when others are present. B) People respond more efficiently in groups rather than alone. C) People feel less personal responsibility to respond when others are present. D) People selectively assign responsibility to others in emergency situations.
A) Taking direct action to help. B) Deciding whether to intervene. C) Assessing the risks involved. D) Being aware of an emergency situation.
A) It delays emergency response time. B) It has no effect on emergency response time. C) It speeds up emergency response time. D) It only affects individual response time.
A) Assume someone else will help and walk away. B) Rely on social norms to guide behavior. C) Take personal responsibility and intervene. D) Avoid getting involved in emergency situations.
A) Encouraging people to solely rely on group decision-making. B) Promoting an individualistic attitude in group settings. C) Educating individuals about the phenomenon and its consequences. D) Ignoring the presence of others in emergency situations.
A) Fifty percent B) Ninety percent C) Seventy percent D) Forty percent
A) Non-dangerous emergencies B) Non-emergency situations C) All types of emergencies D) Dangerous emergencies
A) 30% B) 50% C) 70% D) Over 90%
A) Social comparison B) Social facilitation C) Social identity D) Social influence
A) Indirect intervention B) Passive intervention C) Detour intervention D) Direct intervention
A) Dangerous situations B) Non-emergency situations C) Non-dangerous situations D) All situations
A) Environmental familiarity B) Group cohesiveness C) High ambiguity D) Low consequence
A) Increases likelihood B) Has no effect C) Causes confusion D) Decreases likelihood
A) May inhibit helping behavior B) Has no effect C) Encourages helping behavior D) Increases urgency
A) Four member low cohesive group B) Two member low cohesive group C) Two member high cohesive group D) Four member high cohesive group
A) Interpreting a need for help B) Feeling empathy C) Condensing motives for action D) Noticing that something is wrong
A) A Coast Guard member B) A police officer C) A good samaritan D) A firefighter
A) May 30, 2011 B) March 13, 1964 C) December 25, 1964 D) October 24, 2009
A) Group polarization B) Conformity C) Deindividuation D) Social facilitation
A) Sally Harmen B) Suzy Harmen C) Suzanne Harmen D) Susan Harmen
A) 36.38 seconds B) 45.00 seconds C) 60.00 seconds D) 51.53 seconds
A) If the person was wearing a liked football jersey B) If the person was wearing a disliked football jersey C) If the person was wearing a plain shirt D) If the person was wearing a neutral shirt
A) 2008 B) 2011 C) 2009 D) 2010
A) Causes confusion B) Always inhibits helping C) Has no effect D) Can encourage helping
A) The InterAct Sexual Assault Prevention program B) The Red Flag program C) The Green Dot program D) The Blue Light program
A) James Harmen B) John Harmen C) Jake Harmen D) Jake Smith
A) Social identification predicted helping B) Empathy predicted helping C) Empathy no longer predicted helping D) Group size predicted helping
A) Loss of hearing B) Broken bones C) Scars from cigarette burns on her back D) Amnesia
A) Social status scanning B) Empathic anger C) Pluralistic ignorance D) Moral deliberation
A) Fishing B) Swimming C) Sailing D) Standing neck deep in water
A) Peer pressure B) Compliance with rules C) Fear of punishment D) Gender stereotypes
A) Personal accountability B) Collective consciousness C) Cultural isolation D) Individualism
A) There were more than 38 eyewitnesses B) The attacker was immediately caught C) The police were not called at all D) The story had been exaggerated by the media
A) 2010 B) 2007 C) 2005 D) 2012
A) 36.38 seconds B) 51.53 seconds C) 45.00 seconds D) 60.00 seconds
A) 10 minutes B) 5 minutes C) 3 minutes D) 15 minutes
A) Social comparison theory B) Self-categorization theory C) Social identity theory D) Cognitive dissonance theory
A) Nearly 40 minutes B) 20 minutes C) 30 minutes D) 50 minutes
A) Acting B) Interpreting C) Noticing D) Feeling empathy
A) Mitigating factors B) Justifiable reasons C) Extenuating circumstances D) Reasonable doubt
A) Feeling empathy B) Noticing that something is wrong C) Acting D) Interpreting a need for help
A) 300 B) 100 C) 500 D) 400
A) What Would You Do? The Series B) Primetime: What Would You Do? C) Bystander Intervention: Reality Check D) The Bystander Effect: Live
A) Hypothermia B) Heart attack C) Dehydration D) Drowning |