A) C.A. 3815 B) Act No. 3815 C) P.D. 3815 D) R.A. 3815
A) Presidential Decrees B) Republic Acts C) The Revised Penal Code D) Acts
A) Act No. B) R.A. No. C) P.D. No. D) Com. Act No.
A) Act No. B) P.D. No. C) R.A. No. D) Law No.
A) State power B) Power of expropriation C) Power of eminent domain D) Police power
A) P.D. No. B) R.A. No. C) Batas Blg. D) Act No.
A) Jan. 1, 1930 B) Jan. 1, 1932 C) Jan. 1, 1931 D) Jan. 1, 1933
A) R.A. No. B) P.D. No.
A) None of these B) Power of taxation
A) True, court decisions are merley interpretations of the law. B) False, jurisprudence forms part of the law of the land.
A) Due process is a requirement that legal matters be resolved according to established rules and principles and that individuals be treated fairly. B) It means that the law be just. C) None of these. D) It means that laws be lenient.
A) Tradition theory B) Classical theory C) Positivist theory D) Empirical theory
A) None of these. B) A temporary stay C) A fixed stay. D) An occasional stay
A) Make (a problem, injury, or offense) worse or more serious. B) Cover up for a crime. C) None of these. D) Add cruelty to the commission of the crime.
A) Due process B) General application of laws C) Equal protection D) Bill of attainder
A) Juristic B) Territorial C) Traditional D) Jurisdctional
A) Punishment for someone being hated. B) Punishment inflicted on someone as vengeance for a wrong or criminal act. C) Punishment to spite someone. D) Punishment commensurate to measure of damages.
A) Ambassadors B) Consuls C) Consultants D) Envoys
A) Classical theory B) Positivist theory C) Empirical theory D) Traditional theory
A) Expand the law or congressional act. B) None of these. C) Revoke or annul (a law or congressional act). D) Recall or withdraw a law or congressional act.
A) British rule B) French rule C) English rule D) American rule
A) Clumsiness B) Imprudence C) Felony D) Negligence
A) When the offender commits a crime against persons even if outside the Philippines. B) When the offender commits a crime against public interest even if outside the Philippines. C) When the offender commits a crime against public order even if outside the Philippines. D) When offender commits a crime against national security or the law of nations even if outside the Philippines.
A) All of these are correct. B) No, because X and his companions did not first ascertain the identity of their target. C) No, because X and his companions fired at the person even without danger on their part as A was jsut lying on the hammock. D) No, because X and his companions were negligent.
A) English rule B) British rule C) Frech rule D) American rule
A) Mala in se B) Mala prohibita C) Probable felonies D) Culpable felonies
A) Yes, because any crime committed outsid ethe Philippines is beyond our courts' jurisdiction. B) No, because crimes committed in Philippine ship or airship is within the jurisdiction of our courts even if the ship is outside the country. C) Yes, because the crime was committed outside the Philippines. D) Yes, because criminal law is territorial.
A) English rule B) European rule C) American rule D) British rule
A) English rule B) French rule
A) Regional Trial Court in which the charge was first filed B) Municipal trial courts
A) Lack of intelligence B) Mistake of fact C) Lack of criminal intent D) Lack of freedom
A) By the criminal tendency of a person. B) By the prior acts of a person. C) By the criminal mind of the person. D) By the overt acts of a person.
A) No, X is not correct because the toddler is a minor and if injured by someone, there will always be criminal liability. B) No, X is not correct and he is liable because he was negligent. C) Yes, X is correct because a person is laible only if he has criminal mind. D) No, X is not correct because injuries resulted.
A) Special crime B) Heinous crime C) Mala in se D) Mala prohibita
A) Not criminally liable. B) No moral liability.
A) Acts and omissions punishable by the Revised Penal Code B) All of these.
A) The act of a man defines him. B) A man is defined by his vert acts. C) The criminal mind of a man is shown by his overt acts. D) The act itself does not make a man guilty unless his intentions were so.
A) None of these. B) Excess of force C) Violent strike D) Praeter intentionem
A) Imprudence B) Lack of foresight. C) Clumsiness D) Negligence
A) Mens rea B) Intent
A) True B) True in all cases.
A) Yes, this statement is true because intent is an essential issue in mala in se crimes while mere commission or omission of the prohibited or required act is sufficient in mala prohibita. B) All of these are correct.
A) Such defense is illegal. B) Such defense will exonerate X. C) None of these. D) Such defense will not exonerate X.
A) Homicide because the supposed shooting of A was without aggravating circumstances. B) None of these. C) Murder because the intended victim was A. D) Parricide because the victim was his own father.
A) Culpa B) Imprudence C) Omission D) Negligence
A) Proximate cause B) Mens rea C) Intent D) Motive
A) Prejudice B) Bias C) Intent D) Motive
A) Mistake in the blow B) None of these. C) Mistake in the aim D) Mistake victim
A) Executive B) Legislative C) Judicial D) Political
A) Freedom B) Intent C) All of these. D) Intelligence
A) Fraud B) Omission C) Act D) Intent |