A) Burden of Evidenced. None of the above B) Presumption C) Burden of proof D) Presumption
A) Rebuttal Evidence B) Sur-rebuttal Evidence C) Conclusive Evidence D) Rebuttal Evidence E) Secondary Evidence
A) I will object because the testimony is hearsay B) I will object because the testimony is hearsay C) I will object because the testimony is irrelevant D) I will object because the testimony is based on opinion only E) I will not object because the testimony allowed by law
A) judicial confession B) judicial admission C) admission D) extra-judicial confession E) judicial admission
A) they are extrajudicial admission B) they are judicial admission C) they are extra judicial confession D) they are judicial confession E) they are extra judicial confession
A) common reputation B) dying declaration C) declaration against interest D) res gestae E) res gestae
A) corroborative evidence B) positive evidence C) direct evidence D) corroborative evidence E) cumulative evidence
A) judicial admission B) judicial confession C) judicial confession D) extra-judicial admission E) extra-judicial confession
A) Relationship of Peter and Juanas legitimates on and father, respectively B) Relationship of Maria and Juan as live in partners C) Relationship of Peter and Juanas legitimates on and father, respectively D) Relationship of Maria and Peter as mother and legitimate son, respectively. E) Relationship of Peter and Juan as son and father, respectively.
A) The prosecution has the duty to prove because the accused is not interested in the criminal case B) The prosecution has the on us proband because it is the party filing the case C) The prosecution has the on us proband because it is the party filing the case D) The accused has the onus probandi because he is the one charged E) The accused has the duty to prove because he will be put to jail if he cannot prove his innocence
A) Presumption Juris et de Jure B) Presumption Juris Tantum C) Burden of Proof D) Presumption Juris et de Jure E) Onus Probandi
A) It is not admissible under the ante litem motam rule B) It is not admissible under the inter aliosactanocerenondebet rule C) It is not admissible under the inter aliosactanocerenondebet rule D) it is not admissible under the res ipsa loquitor rule E) It is not admissible under the res gestae rule
A) When he is a Questioned document examiner B) When it is handwriting of one whom he has sufficient familiarity. C) When he is criminology graduate D) When it is handwriting of one whom he has sufficient familiarity. E) when he has to testify only as to mental and emotional state of the one who authored the writing.
A) the doctor can testify because the case is not civil in nature. B) the doctor can not testify because it is hearsay. C) the doctor can not testify because the communication is privileged D) the doctor can testify because the case is not civil in nature. E) The doctor can testify because the case is not criminal in nature.
A) Leading question B) Maliciousquestion C) Leading question D) Misleading question E) Answer
A) Preponderanceofevidence B) None of the above C) All of the above D) Substantial evidence E) Preponderanceofevidence
A) Whether or not Zanjoe is the one committing the crime B) Whether or not Zanjoe is positive for nitrates or nitrites C) Whether or not Zanjoe is the one firing the gun D) Whether or not Zanjoe is questioning the results of the paraffin test E) Whether or not Zanjoe is the one firing the gun
A) Direct Evidence B) Object Evidence C) Substantial Evidence D) Direct Evidence E) Documentary Evidence
A) It was B who died last B) It was B who survived C) It was A who survived D) It was A who survived E) It was A who died first
A) X died a head of W B) X died after W C) W died ahead of X D) Both died at the same time E) X died a head of W
A) Direct Evidence B) Prima facie Evidence C) Conclusive Evidence D) Prima facie Evidence E) Circumstantial Evidence
A) incompetent B) irrelevant C) incompetent D) unacceptable E) voidable
A) The defense will conduct the cross-examination B) The prosecution will conduct re-direct examination C) The prosecution will conduct the direct examination D) The defense will conduct the direct examination E) The defense will conduct the direct examination
A) oral evidence B) object evidence C) documentary evidence D) testimonial evidence E) documentary evidence
A) I will object on the ground of lawyer client privileged communication B) I will not object because it was true that Mang Tomas had beard the conversation C) will object on the ground of incompetency of evidence D) I will object on the ground of irrelevancy of evidence E) I will object on the ground of irrelevancy of evidence
A) The priest cannot testify without violating the hearsay evidence rule B) .The priest cannot be compelled to testify because of priest-penitent privileged communication C) The priest cannot testify without violating the hearsay evidence rule D) The testimony of the priest is admissible because it is a declaration against interest E) The priest can testify as the situation falls under the rule on res gestae
A) Negative Evidence B) Direct Evidence C) Corroborative Evidence D) Direct Evidence E) Circumstantial Evidence
A) Yes, because he has personal knowledge since, he was present at the time Atty. Iglesias and Floyd Pacquaio had conversation B) Yes, because he has personal knowledge since, he was present at the time Atty. Iglesias and Floyd Pacquaio had conversation C) No, because the testimony of Mang Tomas is pure hearsay D) No, because the testimony of Mang Tomas violates the lawyer-client privileged communication rule. E) Yes, because Mang Tomas he did not intentionally spy on his boss lawyer Enrique Iglesias
A) Implied Admission B) Testimonial Evidence C) Secondary Evidence D) Express Admission E) Express Admission
A) marital privilege communication rule B) hearsay evidence rule C) marital privilege disqualification rule D) marital privilege communication rule E) res inter alios acta nocere non debet rule
A) Formal Investigationd. Re-cross examination B) Cross-examination C) Direct examination D) Direct examination
A) Rebuttal Evidence B) Direct Evidence C) Material Evidence D) Relevant Evidence E) Material Evidence
A) he declarant survives B) he declarant survives C) The declaration was made under consciousness of an impending death D) The declaration refers to the cause and surrounding circumstances of the declarant's death E) The declaration relates to facts which the victim is competent to testify
A) it is a dying declaration B) It is hearsay C) it is a dying declaration D) It is corroborative evidence E) it is circumstantial evidence
A) Estoppel in pais B) None of the above C) Estoppel by lashes D) Estoppel in pais E) Estoppel by deed
A) testimony of a deaf-mute in the oral defamation case B) testimony of a 5-year-old girl who was raped C) testimony of a deaf-mute in the oral defamation case D) testimony of a victim's cousin who was a drug addict E) testimony of a blind man in the murder incident involving use of firearm
A) Prima Facie Evidence B) Rebuttal Evidence C) Object evidence D) Competent Evidence E) Competent Evidence
A) No, she cannot refuse to testify because it is not covered by marital disqualification rule B) Yes, she can refuse to testify under the parental privilege rule C) Yes, she can refuse to testify under the parental privilege rule D) No, she cannot refuse because the subpoena is issued by the Court E) Yes, she can refuse not to testify because of privilege communication
A) testimonial B) written agreements C) objects D) written agreements E) documents
A) Cumulative Evidence B) Rebuttal Evidence C) Positive Evidence D) Testimonial Evidence E) Rebuttal Evidence
A) Manner of enforcing criminal law B) Ethical conduct of lawyers C) Civil actions for damages D) Substantive rights of parties E) Administrative penalties
A) Protect only the victim B) Punish the accused immediately C) Prolong the trial process D) Secure the conviction of the guilty while ensuring the innocent are not punished E) Avoid police investigations
A) Trial commencement B) Issuance of a subpoena C) Arrest of the accused D) Filing of a complaint or information E) Decision of the judge
A) The judge B) The accused C) The offended party or any peace officer D) The defense lawyer E) The prosecutor
A) The complainant B) The police investigator C) The judge D) The accused E) The prosecutor
A) The place of arrest B) The penalty prescribed by law for the offense C) The amount of damages claimed D) The type of evidence presented E) The nationality of the accused
A) Only during arraignment B) At all stages of the criminal process C) After conviction D) Only when he requests for it E) Only during trial
A) In the police station B) In private C) Only in the prosecutor’s office D) In open court E) During preliminary investigation
A) A negotiation between prosecutor and accused for a lesser offense B) Decided by the police C) Forbidden in criminal law D) A negotiation between judge and witness E) The same as arraignment
A) Conduct a searching inquiry B) Dismiss the case C) Issue a warrant D) Refer to mediation E) Immediately convict him
A) The mayor B) The judge C) The complainant D) The police chief E) The prosecutor
A) Fine B) Guarantee for appearance in court C) Punishment D) Civil indemnity E) Confession
A) No postponement is allowed B) The court must dispose of the case without unreasonable delay C) The prosecution must drop weak cases D) Trial must be finished in one day E) The accused cannot delay trial
A) There are two informations filed B) The court changes the charge C) The prosecution presents two witnesses D) The accused appeals his case E) The accused is tried twice for the same offense
A) The civil damages B) The sufficiency of evidence to file information C) The sentence to be imposed D) The guilt of the accused E) The jurisdiction of the court
A) The judge B) The accused C) The complainant’s lawyer D) The defense E) The prosecutor
A) Substantial evidence B) Preponderance of evidence C) Probable cause D) Proof beyond reasonable doubt E) Clear and convincing evidence
A) Appeal B) Execution of judgment C) Filing of complaint D) Conviction E) Issuance of warrant of arrest
A) All evidence is admissible B) Illegally obtained evidence is inadmissible C) Character evidence is always allowed D) Only hearsay is excluded E) Confessions can be forced
A) Based on the witness’s own knowledge B) Based on what another person told the witness C) Always admissible D) Derived from physical evidence E) From an expert opinion
A) The officer who filed the information had no authority to do so B) The accused was previously convicted of another offense C) The court has no jurisdiction over the person of the accused D) The information does not conform substantially to the prescribed form E) The facts charged do not constitute an offense
A) Require the prosecution to prove the guilt and degree of culpability B) Dismiss the case C) Ask the accused to withdraw the plea D) Refer the case to the Supreme Court E) Immediately impose sentence
A) Remain in detention B) Produce documents or objects for inspection C) Appear in court and testify D) Pay a fine to the court E) Execute a written testimony
A) The court decides which evidence is best B) Testimonies are better than written evidence C) Copies are sufficient proof of authenticity D) Secondary evidence may always be admitted E) Only the original of a document is admissible to prove its contents
A) By credible testimony B) Beyond reasonable doubt C) By probable cause D) By clear and convincing evidence E) By a preponderance of evidence
A) Objects used in the commission of the crime B) Expert opinion submitted to the court C) Written statements or documents D) Audio recordings E) Testimony given by witnesses under oath
A) The right to appeal B) The right against self-incrimination and to counsel C) The right to be free from double jeopardy D) The right to bail E) The right to speedy disposition of cases
A) Demurrer to evidence B) Lack of probable cause C) Double jeopardy D) Rebuttal testimony E) Improper venue
A) The penalty imposed by law B) The person of the accused C) The facts proving that a crime has been committed D) The confession of the suspect E) The body of the victim only
A) Allow secret testimonies B) Remove the need for witnesses C) Simplify cross-examination D) Avoid written evidence E) Speed up trial by replacing direct testimonies with affidavits
A) The case is reopened automatically B) The case is transferred to another court C) The decision is void D) The decision can still be appealed E) The judgment can no longer be modified or appealed
A) Order of the prosecutor B) Finding of probable cause by the judge C) Motion of the complainant D) Filing of the affidavit E) Request of the police officer
A) Evidence based on the testimony of a witness B) Evidence derived from an illegal search or seizure C) Evidence submitted by the defense D) Evidence obtained from a lawful arrest E) Evidence approved by the court
A) Bail is a security for the release of an accused B) Bail is not allowed before filing of a complaint C) Bail is a matter of right after conviction by the RTC D) Bail may be posted only by the police E) Bail automatically extinguishes the criminal case
A) Being tried twice for the same offense B) Being convicted twice of different offenses C) Being tried in two different courts D) Being arrested by two police units E) Being acquitted and later convicted
A) Crimes committed by public officials in relation to their office B) All criminal cases C) Administrative cases of government employees D) Civil cases involving government officials E) Election-related crimes
A) Drug-related cases B) Libel cases C) Traffic violations D) Estafa cases E) Trespassing cases
A) Suspend the prosecutor B) Appoint a public attorney C) Issue a warrant of arrest D) Dismiss the case E) Proceed with trial
A) Questioning by the defense B) Questioning by the prosecution of its own witness C) Leading questions by any party D) Questioning by the judge E) Cross-examination of witnesses
A) Used only by expert witnesses B) Allowed during cross-examination C) Prohibited during all examinations D) Required in re-direct examination E) Allowed during direct examination
A) Summarize all testimonies B) Support the testimony of one’s own witness C) Present new evidence D) Test the truthfulness and credibility of the witness E) Introduce exhibits
A) Circumstantial Evidence B) Direct Evidence C) Circumstantial Evidence D) Expert Evidence E) Competent Evidence
A) documentary evidence rule B) secondary evidence rule C) testimonial knowledge rule D) parol evidence rule E) secondary evidence rule
A) res inter alios acta rule B) dying declaration C) res gestae rule D) res inter alios acta rule E) testimonial knowledge rule
A) Baptismal certificate of Peter where the name of Juan appear sin the entry of father B) Birth Certificate of Peter where the entry of Father's Name is marked "unknown" C) Testimony of Maria that she was a mistress of Juan D) Testimony of Maria that she is the mother of Peter and Juan is the father E) Baptismal certificate of Peter where the name of Juan appear sin the entry of father
A) corroborative evidence B) substantial evidence C) relevant evidence D) material evidence E) material evidence
A) Conclusive presumption B) Presumption C) Presumption D) Burden of proof E) Burden of Evidence
A) .it is considered a dying declaration c. it is extrajudicial confession b. it is considered part of the res gestae B) it is a declaration against interest C) it is considered part of the res gestae D) it is extrajudicial confession E) it is considered a dying declaration L
A) cumulative evidence B) demonstrative evidence C) corroborative evidence D) real evidence E) demonstrative evidence
A) It proves the conduct of the paraffin test only B) It proves the guilt of the person found positive of nitrates or nitrates C) It proves the firing of the gun by the person found positive of nitrates or nitrites D) It proves the presence or absence of nitrates or nitrites E) It proves the presence or absence of nitrates or nitrites
A) leading B) leading C) stupid D) misleading E) hearsay
A) None of the above B) Burden of evidence C) Burden of evidence D) Burden of proof E) presumption
A) B and A must have argument and has grudges B) B'sdeath is indispensable C) B's wound must be fatal D) B'sdeath is indispensable E) The declaration must be written
A) None of the above B) Burden of proof C) Burden of evidence D) Presumptions E) Burden of proof
A) The Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure B) The Rules of Summary Procedure C) The Rule of Court Testimony D) The Oral Testimonies of Witness' Rule E) The Rules of Summary Procedure
A) it is a dying declaration and therefore admissible in court B) it is an admission and therefore admissible in court C) it is a confession and therefore admissible in court D) it is an admission and therefore admissible in court E) it is part of the res gestae and therefore admissible in court
A) Conclusive Evidence B) Real Evidence C) SecondaryEvidence D) Conclusive Evidence E) Expert Evidence
A) Conclusive evidence B) Best evidence C) Primary evidence D) Secondary evidence E) Conclusive evidence
A) Corroborative B) excluded by law C) best evidence D) Admissible E) excluded by law
A) Rebuttal Evidence B) Positive Evidence C) Testimonial Evidence D) Rebuttal Evidence E) Cumulative Evidence |