A) An instinctual response to assist in any emergency situation. B) A study that shows people are more likely to help when alone. C) A behavior that encourages individuals to intervene in group settings. D) A phenomenon where individuals are less likely to offer help in an emergency situation when other people are present.
A) 1982. B) 1975. C) 1968. D) 1990.
A) Rapid decision-making skills. B) Diffusion of responsibility. C) Strong individualistic values. D) Heightened sense of personal responsibility.
A) People respond more efficiently in groups rather than alone. B) People selectively assign responsibility to others in emergency situations. C) People feel less personal responsibility to respond when others are present. D) People feel more personal responsibility to respond when others are present.
A) Being aware of an emergency situation. B) Deciding whether to intervene. C) Assessing the risks involved. D) Taking direct action to help.
A) It has no effect on emergency response time. B) It speeds up emergency response time. C) It only affects individual response time. D) It delays emergency response time.
A) Rely on social norms to guide behavior. B) Assume someone else will help and walk away. C) Avoid getting involved in emergency situations. D) Take personal responsibility and intervene.
A) Encouraging people to solely rely on group decision-making. B) Ignoring the presence of others in emergency situations. C) Educating individuals about the phenomenon and its consequences. D) Promoting an individualistic attitude in group settings.
A) Seventy percent B) Forty percent C) Fifty percent D) Ninety percent
A) Non-dangerous emergencies B) Non-emergency situations C) All types of emergencies D) Dangerous emergencies
A) 30% B) 50% C) 70% D) Over 90%
A) Social comparison B) Social influence C) Social identity D) Social facilitation
A) Passive intervention B) Detour intervention C) Indirect intervention D) Direct intervention
A) All situations B) Non-dangerous situations C) Dangerous situations D) Non-emergency situations
A) Low consequence B) High ambiguity C) Group cohesiveness D) Environmental familiarity
A) Increases likelihood B) Has no effect C) Decreases likelihood D) Causes confusion
A) Encourages helping behavior B) Has no effect C) Increases urgency D) May inhibit helping behavior
A) Two member high cohesive group B) Four member high cohesive group C) Four member low cohesive group D) Two member low cohesive group
A) Noticing that something is wrong B) Feeling empathy C) Condensing motives for action D) Interpreting a need for help
A) A Coast Guard member B) A good samaritan C) A firefighter D) A police officer
A) October 24, 2009 B) March 13, 1964 C) December 25, 1964 D) May 30, 2011
A) Group polarization B) Social facilitation C) Deindividuation D) Conformity
A) Sally Harmen B) Suzanne Harmen C) Susan Harmen D) Suzy Harmen
A) 60.00 seconds B) 45.00 seconds C) 51.53 seconds D) 36.38 seconds
A) If the person was wearing a liked football jersey B) If the person was wearing a plain shirt C) If the person was wearing a disliked football jersey D) If the person was wearing a neutral shirt
A) 2011 B) 2009 C) 2010 D) 2008
A) Causes confusion B) Has no effect C) Always inhibits helping D) Can encourage helping
A) The Green Dot program B) The Red Flag program C) The Blue Light program D) The InterAct Sexual Assault Prevention program
A) Jake Harmen B) James Harmen C) Jake Smith D) John Harmen
A) Empathy no longer predicted helping B) Group size predicted helping C) Social identification predicted helping D) Empathy predicted helping
A) Loss of hearing B) Amnesia C) Broken bones D) Scars from cigarette burns on her back
A) Pluralistic ignorance B) Empathic anger C) Social status scanning D) Moral deliberation
A) Swimming B) Standing neck deep in water C) Fishing D) Sailing
A) Peer pressure B) Compliance with rules C) Gender stereotypes D) Fear of punishment
A) Personal accountability B) Cultural isolation C) Collective consciousness D) Individualism
A) The story had been exaggerated by the media B) There were more than 38 eyewitnesses C) The attacker was immediately caught D) The police were not called at all
A) 2010 B) 2012 C) 2007 D) 2005
A) 60.00 seconds B) 51.53 seconds C) 45.00 seconds D) 36.38 seconds
A) 3 minutes B) 15 minutes C) 10 minutes D) 5 minutes
A) Social identity theory B) Social comparison theory C) Cognitive dissonance theory D) Self-categorization theory
A) 50 minutes B) Nearly 40 minutes C) 30 minutes D) 20 minutes
A) Feeling empathy B) Noticing C) Interpreting D) Acting
A) Extenuating circumstances B) Justifiable reasons C) Mitigating factors D) Reasonable doubt
A) Interpreting a need for help B) Acting C) Noticing that something is wrong D) Feeling empathy
A) 300 B) 100 C) 500 D) 400
A) Bystander Intervention: Reality Check B) What Would You Do? The Series C) The Bystander Effect: Live D) Primetime: What Would You Do?
A) Hypothermia B) Heart attack C) Dehydration D) Drowning |