A) Disgrace B) Indignity C) Scandal D) Unjust vexation
A) If the mistress is kept outside the conjugal dwelling B) If the man is legally married C) If the mistress is a virgin D) If the mistress is a relative
A) Cohabit B) Marriage C) Joint household D) Live-in
A) Expert evidence B) Testimonial evidence C) Oral evidence D) Documentary evidence
A) Object evidence B) Relevant evidence C) Real evidence D) Material evidence
A) Unreal evidence B) None of these C) Inadmissible evidence D) Incompetent evidence
A) Medical science B) All of these C) Forensic science D) Undeciphered writings
A) Leading question B) Compound question C) General question D) Misleading question
A) General question B) Leading question C) Compound question D) Misleading question
A) General question B) Compound question C) Leading question D) Misleading question
A) None of these B) Capacity of communication C) Capacity of observation D) Capacity of recollection
A) Sterility of the offender B) Use of force or intimidation by the offender C) All of the foregoing D) Resistance on the part of the victim
A) When it is not excluded by the law or the rules of court B) All of the foregoing C) When it is relevant to the issue D) When it is competent
A) Pleadings B) Judicial admissions C) Judicial confessions D) Judicial notice
A) Primary or best evidence B) Competent evidence C) Conclusive evidence D) Secondary evidence
A) Primary or best evidence B) Secondary evidence C) Conclusive evidence D) Competent evidence
A) Parol evidence rule B) Hearsay rule C) Res Gestae rule D) Best evidence rule
A) It involves civil cases filed by one against the other B) The wife is a party to the case C) The husband is a party to the case D) The spouses was legally married
A) Private communication B) Privilege communication C) Confidential communication D) Dying declaration
A) Communication was made in the course of professional employment B) Existence of an attorney client relation C) No consent was given by the client to the attorney testifying thereon D) None of the above
A) A criminal case by one the parent against the other B) A crime against him C) All of the foregoing D) A criminal case by one grandparent against another
A) Compromise B) Stipulation C) Contract D) Plea bargaining
A) Admission by agent or privies B) Admission by conspirator C) All of the foregoing D) Admission by a co- partner/joint owner or debtor
A) The admission was made during the existence of the agency B) The admission refers to a matter within the scope of his authority C) All of the foregoing D) The agency is proved by evidence other the admission itself
A) None of the above B) Imminent death but the declarant is conscious of facts C) The declarant is a competent witness and the declaration is offered in a criminal case wherein the declarant's death is subject to the inquiry D) The declaration must concern the crime regarding the declarant's death
A) Conclusive presumption B) Disputable C) Stoppel D) Presumption
A) By evidence of his general reputation and integrity, and conviction of a crime involving moral turpitude B) None of the above C) By evidence of other statements made by the witness which are inconsistent. D) A contradictory evidence
A) Judicial notice B) Blotter C) Judicial Record D) Official record
A) When combined proof beyond reasonable doubt may be established B) There is more than one circumstance C) The facts from which the inference are derived were proven D) All of the foregoing
A) Non of the foregoing B) Some person is criminally responsible for the act C) That a certain result has been produced D) The accused need not necessarily be the doer of the act
A) Parental privilege B) Privileged conversation C) Filial privilege D) Dying declaration
A) Evidence against the accused B) Means that the accused is an accessory to the crime C) Prima facie evidence of fencing D) Means that the accused is not the owner
A) Corroborative B) Relevant C) Circumstantial D) Cumulative
A) Real B) Testimonial C) Material D) Corroborative
A) Penitent B) Patient C) Client D) Secretary
A) Children B) Sick persons C) Insane persons D) Homosexuals and lesbians
A) Secondary evidence B) Res gestae C) Best evidence D) Real evidence
A) Competency B) Admissibility C) Qualification D) Eligibility
A) Proof B) Intent C) Motive D) Evidence
A) Genuine B) Authentic C) Duplicate D) Original
A) Dead man statute B) Ante mortern statement C) Mi ultimo adios D) Parol evidence
A) They can relate to those facts truly to the court at the time they are offered as witness B) They have not reached the age of discernment. C) They must have sufficient knowledge to receive just impressions as to the facts on which testify D) They understand the obligation of the oath
A) Ultimate fact B) Proof beyond reasonable doubt C) Preponderance of evidence D) Substantial evidence
A) Owes probandi B) Factum probandum C) Res gestae D) Factum probans
A) Clerk of court B) Witness C) Prosecution D) Defense
A) Testimony B) Admission C) Extra-judicial confession D) Confession
A) Judicial confession B) Extra-judicial C) Confession D) Admission
A) Testimonial evidence B) Dying declaration C) Res gestae D) Hearsay
A) Pedigree B) Inheritance C) Tradition D) Heritage
A) Owe probandi B) Factum probans C) Factum probandum D) Owes probandi
A) Weight of evidence B) Evidentiary fact C) Ultimate fact D) Preponderance of evidence
A) Best evidence B) Weight of evidence C) Preponderance of evidence D) Secondary evidence
A) Corpus delicti B) Autoptic evidence C) Physical evidence D) Real evidence
A) The combination of all the circumstance is such as to produce a conviction beyond reasonable doubt. B) The facts from which the inference are derived must be proved C) There is more than one circumstance D) It must be of judicial recognizance
A) 1 B) 2 C) 3 D) None
A) Conclusive presumptions B) Conclusion C) Presumption D) Disputable presumption
A) Burden of evidence B) Burden of proff C) Res gestae D) Estoppel
A) Burden of proof B) Res gestae C) Burden of evidence D) Estoppel
A) Misleading B) Estoppel C) Leading D) Res gestae
A) Private document B) Official document C) Official record D) Public document
A) Positive identification B) Proof C) Testimony D) Evidence
A) Rules on Criminal Procedure B) Rules of Court C) Revised Penal Code D) Constitution
A) Preponderance of evidence B) Evidentiary fact C) Weight of evidence D) Ultimate fact
A) Material B) Admissible C) Relevant D) Compenent
A) Material B) Relevant C) Direct D) Competent
A) competent B) Material C) Relevant D) Direct
A) Circumstantial B) Cumulative C) Corroborative D) Real
A) Circumstantial B) Cumulative C) Real D) Corroborative
A) Real evidence B) Documentary evidence C) Testimonial evidence D) Admission evidence
A) Positive B) Circumstantial C) Negative D) Direct
A) Primary B) Secondary C) Best D) Prima facie
A) Primary B) Expert C) Best D) Secondary
A) Conclusive B) Primary C) Best D) Real
A) Sec 17 Bill of Rights B) Sec 12 Bill of Rights C) Sec 3 Bill of Rights
A) Judicial Admission B) Judicial Notice C) Judicial knowledge D) Cognizance
A) Misleading B) Leading C) Res gestae D) Confusing
A) Negative evidence B) Material evidence C) Positive evidence D) Relevant evidence
A) Motion to dismiss B) Motion to inhibit C) Motion to postpone D) Plea to dismiss
A) There is more than one circumstance B) The combination of all the circumstances is such as to produce a conviction beyond reasonable doubt. C) The facts from which the inference are derived must be proved D) All of these
A) Some person is criminally liable for the act. B) The accused need not necessarily be the doer of the act the C) That a certain result has been produced. D) The accused must be the doer of the act
A) Both B and C B) Testimony of anyone who saw the execution of the writing. C) Evidence of the genuineness of the handwriting of the writer D) Testimony of the one who made the writing
A) Public Document B) Private Document C) Genuine document D) Holographic document
A) A questioned document examiner. B) a. Secretary of the accused for 20 years Friend and co-employee of the accused for more than 20 years. C) Any of the foregoing. D) Secretary of the accused for 20 years.
A) Evidence of fraud in the party offering the record with respect to the proceedings. B) Evidence of collusion between the parties in the proceedings. C) Any of the foregoing D) Evidence of want in the jurisdiction in the court of judicial officer with respect to the proceedings.
A) After testimony B) Before testimony of the witness C) After the oath of taken by the witness D) After the oath of taken by the witness
A) After the direct examination of the witness. B) After the testimony of the witness C) During the cross examination D) At any time and as soon as the grounds therefore become reasonably apparent.
A) Be of no bearing since it is related and important with the case at hand. B) Prompt the court to issue a subpoena C) Prompt the court to accept it. D) Prompt the court to exclude the same from the record
A) Before it has been offered in evidence B) d. None of these C) After it has been offered in evidence d wit D) Within 3 days after notice of the offer unless a different period is allowed by the court.
A) Proof beyond reasonable doubt B) Preponderance of evidence C) Weight of evidence D) Sufficiency of evidence
A) During pre-trial B) After a party's testimonial evidence C) After the presentation of witnesses of both litigants D) After pre trial
A) When there is difficulty in obtaining direct and intelligible answers from the witness. B) By contradictory evidence C) In interrogation of an unwilling or hostile witness. D) When they relate to preliminary matters.
A) A deaf-mute person B) A child of tender age C) A registered voter D) A feeble minded person
A) Where the witness is not voluntarily offered but required by law to be presented by the proponent. B) Any of the foregoing. C) In case of a hostile witness. D) Where the witness is the adverse party or the representative of a juridical person which is the adverse party.
A) Evidence that his general reputation for truth or integrity is bad. B) By contradictory evidence C) In case of a hostile witness D) Inconsistencies of statements made with respect to the testimony.
A) Testimonial evidence B) Extra judicial statements C) Oral testimony D) Deposition
A) Extensive Training and Education B) Of legal age C) Presentation of the authorities on which his opinions are based D) Particular first hand familiarity with the facts of the present case
A) The statements made must refer to the occurrence in question and its attending circumstance. B) There must be a startling occurrence C) The statement must be spontaneous. D) It must exist previous to the controversy
A) Capacity of observation B) Capacity of knowledge C) Capacity of communication D) Capacity of recollection
A) Authentic document B) Holographic document C) Questioned document D) Genuine document
A) Collusion between in parties B) Want of jurisdiction in the court or judicial officer C) Alterations D) Fraud in the party offering the recoerd |