A) C.A. 3815 B) Act No. 3815 C) R.A. 3815 D) P.D. 3815
A) Republic Acts B) Presidential Decrees C) Acts D) The Revised Penal Code
A) Act No. B) P.D. No. C) R.A. No. D) Com. Act No.
A) Law No. B) Act No. C) R.A. No. D) P.D. No.
A) State power B) Power of expropriation C) Police power D) Power of eminent domain
A) R.A. No. B) P.D. No. C) Batas Blg. D) Act No.
A) Jan. 1, 1932 B) Jan. 1, 1931 C) Jan. 1, 1930 D) Jan. 1, 1933
A) R.A. No. B) P.D. No.
A) None of these B) Power of taxation
A) True, court decisions are merley interpretations of the law. B) False, jurisprudence forms part of the law of the land.
A) Due process is a requirement that legal matters be resolved according to established rules and principles and that individuals be treated fairly. B) It means that the law be just. C) None of these. D) It means that laws be lenient.
A) Classical theory B) Empirical theory C) Tradition theory D) Positivist theory
A) An occasional stay B) A fixed stay. C) None of these. D) A temporary stay
A) Add cruelty to the commission of the crime. B) Make (a problem, injury, or offense) worse or more serious. C) Cover up for a crime. D) None of these.
A) General application of laws B) Bill of attainder C) Equal protection D) Due process
A) Territorial B) Traditional C) Juristic D) Jurisdctional
A) Punishment commensurate to measure of damages. B) Punishment inflicted on someone as vengeance for a wrong or criminal act. C) Punishment for someone being hated. D) Punishment to spite someone.
A) Envoys B) Ambassadors C) Consuls D) Consultants
A) Traditional theory B) Empirical theory C) Positivist theory D) Classical theory
A) Revoke or annul (a law or congressional act). B) None of these. C) Expand the law or congressional act. D) Recall or withdraw a law or congressional act.
A) British rule B) English rule C) American rule D) French rule
A) Imprudence B) Negligence C) Clumsiness D) Felony
A) When the offender commits a crime against persons even if outside the Philippines. B) When the offender commits a crime against public interest even if outside the Philippines. C) When the offender commits a crime against public order even if outside the Philippines. D) When offender commits a crime against national security or the law of nations even if outside the Philippines.
A) No, because X and his companions fired at the person even without danger on their part as A was jsut lying on the hammock. B) No, because X and his companions were negligent. C) All of these are correct. D) No, because X and his companions did not first ascertain the identity of their target.
A) American rule B) Frech rule C) British rule D) English rule
A) Mala in se B) Mala prohibita C) Probable felonies D) Culpable felonies
A) No, because crimes committed in Philippine ship or airship is within the jurisdiction of our courts even if the ship is outside the country. B) Yes, because any crime committed outsid ethe Philippines is beyond our courts' jurisdiction. C) Yes, because criminal law is territorial. D) Yes, because the crime was committed outside the Philippines.
A) British rule B) English rule C) European rule D) American rule
A) English rule B) French rule
A) Regional Trial Court in which the charge was first filed B) Municipal trial courts
A) Mistake of fact B) Lack of intelligence C) Lack of freedom D) Lack of criminal intent
A) By the criminal mind of the person. B) By the prior acts of a person. C) By the overt acts of a person. D) By the criminal tendency of a person.
A) No, X is not correct because injuries resulted. B) No, X is not correct and he is liable because he was negligent. C) Yes, X is correct because a person is laible only if he has criminal mind. D) No, X is not correct because the toddler is a minor and if injured by someone, there will always be criminal liability.
A) Mala prohibita B) Mala in se C) Heinous crime D) Special crime
A) Not criminally liable. B) No moral liability.
A) All of these. B) Acts and omissions punishable by the Revised Penal Code
A) The act itself does not make a man guilty unless his intentions were so. B) The criminal mind of a man is shown by his overt acts. C) A man is defined by his vert acts. D) The act of a man defines him.
A) None of these. B) Violent strike C) Excess of force D) Praeter intentionem
A) Clumsiness B) Negligence C) Lack of foresight. D) Imprudence
A) Mens rea B) Intent
A) True B) True in all cases.
A) Yes, this statement is true because intent is an essential issue in mala in se crimes while mere commission or omission of the prohibited or required act is sufficient in mala prohibita. B) All of these are correct.
A) None of these. B) Such defense will not exonerate X. C) Such defense will exonerate X. D) Such defense is illegal.
A) Homicide because the supposed shooting of A was without aggravating circumstances. B) Murder because the intended victim was A. C) None of these. D) Parricide because the victim was his own father.
A) Omission B) Culpa C) Imprudence D) Negligence
A) Proximate cause B) Motive C) Intent D) Mens rea
A) Motive B) Bias C) Intent D) Prejudice
A) Mistake in the blow B) None of these. C) Mistake in the aim D) Mistake victim
A) Political B) Judicial C) Legislative D) Executive
A) Intent B) All of these. C) Freedom D) Intelligence
A) Act B) Fraud C) Omission D) Intent |